How to deal with reviewer feedback in academic publishing

Academic publishing is a laborious, painstaking, and time-consuming process. Article review is one of the essential steps before any academic study gets published. And, chances are slim that any manuscript would be accepted in its original form, and an author would not receive any feedback. That is only possible if there is no well-established review process in the journal, which rather points to unethical practices in academic publishing.

5 facts about peer review that you want to know

Peer review is a process of evaluating and scrutinizing scholarly work, such as research papers, manuscripts, or grant proposals, by experts in the relevant field. It involves an independent assessment of the quality, validity, and relevance of the work, with the goal of ensuring that the work meets the rigorous standards of academic excellence.